• @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    53
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    They would have 40 electoral college votes in 2024.

    If they secede, that would also mean losing 2 Senators and 38 Representatives, changing the balance of power in the House and Senate.

    Don’t threaten me with a good time!

    Edit I also want to see Ted Cruz’s face when he learns he’s not a Senator anymore because Texas seceded.

    • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      It would also reduce the number needed to win.

      538 EC votes / 2 = 269. 50%+1 for the win so 270.

      Texas drops out, so now it goes from 538 to 498. / 2 = 249. 50%+1=250 to win.

      And suddenly 270towin.com needs a new CNAME.

      Just playing around with what something like that might look like:

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        295 months ago

        Yeah, Texas is a reliable GOP vote. Which means losing it would be a massive blow to GOP electoral chances.

        • netburnr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          Not all of us, just need more of y’all to move here and water down their vote. Problem is the germandering makes populated places less impacting than the uneducated rural areas.

          • Baron Von J
            link
            fedilink
            75 months ago

            There’s enough of us here to do it already, we just need to actually go out and vote and we can win the state-wide and presidential elections here. In 2020 Biden received more votes in Texas than in New York. The metro area populations of Houston, Austin, Dallas, and San Antonio are more than half the state population. If Harris County’s efforts to expand mail-in voting (by sending mail-in ballots to all ~2.4M registered voters in the county) Biden may have won the state, as he only lost by ~620k.

            • netburnr
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              I vote every time and post in the Austin community as much as I dare to encourage others. That’s about all I can do.

          • PugJesus
            link
            fedilink
            55 months ago

            Gerrymandering has a very limited effect on presidential elections, which is what was mentioned.

            • zkfcfbzr
              link
              fedilink
              English
              65 months ago

              It still has a big indirect impact. People are less likely to vote if they feel like their vote doesn’t matter as much, and someone in a heavily gerrymandered state does in fact have their vote matter less, at least locally. Turnout would probably be measurably higher if the districts were fair or competitive.

              There are other indirect effects too - there are plenty of states where Republicans are only able to pass voter-suppressing policies because of the legislative edge they hold thanks to gerrymandering.

            • squiblet
              link
              fedilink
              45 months ago

              Voter suppression and other unequal access to voting make a big difference. For instance, the “one drop off box per county” bs they schemed up, inadequate in-person facilities in urban areas leading to long lines, and how people don’t get voting day off work. Not to mention the fascist chuds planning to stand around with guns at voting facilities to “monitor”.

  • PugJesus
    link
    fedilink
    25
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Please, for Christ’s sake, just leave. Have the plebiscite. Take it to Congress. Let them release you on the condition that all Americans in Texas be allowed to emigrate, fully compensated, and all wannabe Texans are allowed to immigrate, fully compensated, for the next 6 months.

    Oh, and we keep the military equipment. I’m sure their ‘well-regulated militia’ will be enough for them.

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      115 months ago

      Also we’ll build a wall at the Texas-US borders, but not because we think it’ll be effective, just because it’ll be hilarious

    • PlasterAnalyst
      link
      fedilink
      115 months ago

      We’ll leave it there for convenience when we invade since they will be an unstable oil rich nation in need of freedom.

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        Ugh, no, let them stay out. We don’t need a Resource Trap country to try nation-building on, pretty sure we already tried that one.

        • Osa-Eris-Xero512
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          Not 80s-90s era ‘nation building’, 40s era reconstruction. If nazi germany is salvageable we can probably figure texas out with the correct level of commitment.

  • Tedesche
    link
    fedilink
    English
    225 months ago

    OMFG I hope they do. They could no longer bus immigrants to other states and would have no other choice but to police their border with Mexico entirely on their own without any federal support. Fucking dumbasses.

  • chaogomu
    link
    fedilink
    19
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    So nowhere in the article is it mentioned that the supposed “Texas right to secede” is actually bullshit, and a complete misunderstanding of the actual right that they have, which is to be broken up into five separate states.

    Except even that is bullshit, because it was talking about the Texas Territory, which was larger than modern day Texas.

    The constitution clearly says that;

    New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

    So yes, Texas could request to be broken up, but congress still needs to okay it.


    Now, as to the “right to secede”, that bullshit was settled with the Civil War, States do not have the right to secede, not even Texas.

    Republicans like to pretend the Civil War never happened, and want a repeat, I guess.

  • @phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    115 months ago

    I’d love to see that happen.

    Do you think the US would leave it’s army and it’s nukes in a different country just like that? Texas has a fun economy

    Then the Republican party would lose a large red state, we would finally be rid of Republican presidents and houses, no more extremist bullshit to deal with.

    The US would flourish again and go truly MAGA as it no longer had to deal with the Republican shit.

    Texas has shit infrastructure that they don’t manage well enough to keep up, it would be a hoot

    • @vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      Texas is home to some of the largest military installations on the planet (Fort Bliss and Fort Cavazos) - the federal economic footprint these (and Lackland, and JSB Carswell and a dozen others) bring to their local economies is massive. Hell, the defense industry footprint in texas is ridiculously large (existing and future helos & fixed wing f22/f35 production) - removing them from Texas would crater their economy.

      I tend to look at this like another grift to skin more funds from the stupids.

      • @phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        Yeah, nobody currently in charge would be stoopid enough to do this, but then again each subsequent Republican generation becomes dumber and starts doing the things the previous generation only threatened for money and power. I see them dumb enough to try this 10 years down the road

      • @BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        Joint Base San Antonio is essentially three bases that almost surround most of San Antonio.

        As if the feds are just going to walk away from that AND NASA? No way.

  • BanditMcDougal
    link
    fedilink
    115 months ago

    I’m not sure Texas is thinking this through. We’d build a wall and make them pay for it…

  • kellyaster
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Y’know, if Texas secedes, we won’t have to change the flag and remove a star if we make Puerto Rico a state. Just sayin’.

  • @TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    105 months ago

    Oh yes please. The next hurricane that hits we won’t have to pay for, and when they freeze or melt because their electrical grid collapses we can just watch.

    • gullible
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      Texas is one of the few financially functional red states so that wouldn’t be a concern. No clue whether they’d maintain their finances if they seceded.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        How financially functional do you think they’ll be when they lose all the trade agreements of the US and the ability to freely trade with the other states?

        • gullible
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          I have no clue, and anyone on the internet who says they do is dubious at best. It’s an incredibly complex question.

          • HopeOfTheGunblade
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            It didn’t go so hot after Brexit, I can’t imagine why we should expect Texit to go better.

        • oo1
          link
          fedilink
          05 months ago

          Do they still have lots of oil?

          That’s a fairly widely traded commodity so probably would help buffer against impacts on other industries of trade instability. Though they might have to consider higher tax on oil or something.

          • HopeOfTheGunblade
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            Does Texas have lots of oil, or do oil companies have lots of oil that happens to be located in Texas?

  • Spaghetti_Hitchens
    link
    fedilink
    95 months ago

    ITT: A bunch of people who don’t realize Texas is nearly purple, but gerrymandered to hell. There are millions of us who are blue.

  • Twink Freud ✊🏰🕰️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    85 months ago

    don’t let the door hit you in your racist ass. good luck with that whole electricity thing, we’re proud to welcome refugee from The Christian Republic of Trumpistan

    • @cheesebag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      Texas was a slave state & fought for the Confederacy. They mustn’t secede now for the same reason as back then- they will absolutely terrorize & abuse every minority person they can in that would-be despotic shithole.

      If you’re going to say “good riddance”, look every woman, poor, black, and lgbt person there in the eye as you do, because those are the people you’re throwing to the wolves.

  • tiredofsametab
    link
    fedilink
    35 months ago

    Good luck with that. Yes, one of the major ports in the US is there, lots of military, oil and gas, etc. However, leaving the US, particularly with the local gov having a hard-on for dictatorial bullshit, would basically immediately prove a danger to the US as it could threaten security by (a) having all the left-over military assets but also (b) they could theoretically invite Russia or someone to build a base in Texas and the US will be having none of that. Succession almost certainly means war almost immediately.

    • @AquaTofana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      65 months ago

      I doubt the DoD would just let those assets remain in Texas if the state chooses to secede. They’d likely take it all back, and position it strategically to protect against a now hostile foreign nation.

      … at least, that’s what I’m hoping for as a piece of “military property”.

      Please, JFC, don’t leave us here!