• @NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    465 months ago

    What a bunch of fucking bullshit, STOP. SPYING. ON. YOUR. OWN. CITIZENS. CUNT. BAGS.

    It is completely unequivocally a violation of the god damn 4th ammendment. We do not need 1984 fucking big brother breathing down our necks all the time.

    • @Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s really weird to say, but I agree with Rand Paul on this issue. Found our 1% common ground.

      • @NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I have no idea what Rand Paul said about this, and if he isn’t agreeing with me on this one, then he’s wrong.

        Edit: Holy shit, he tried to stop the reauthorization of the bill. I can’t believe we are on the same side with this issue.

        • @Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          95 months ago

          Makes sense to me. You care about the 4th Amendment right to be secure from unreasonable searches and he cares about keeping all his secret communicatin with his Russian handlers secure from incidental discovery during an unreasonable search.

          • @NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            I mean, maybe. But you can aways catch people using traditional surveillance methods to catch shit like that. There is no need to add backdoor spy devices and APIs into every electronic device that is connected to the internet. It’s fucking unnecessary and way extremely over the top big brother, and could lead to some really shit suppression of opposing viewpoints. Just wait until a smart authoritarian person goes and fills trumps shoes, then we’ll really be in trouble.

    • @SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This is explicitly surveillance of foreign entities. The “backdoor” described is that your communications with foreign entities can be collected because the entire comm is collected.

      You can disapprove of this program (I do, for other reasons), but it is not “1984”-style surveillance.

      • @NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        Yeah, it kinda is, whether you think so or not. Any spying that involves warrantless collection of citizens data is a 1984 style surveillance program, nevermind that there are literally NSA programs to do this very thing to spy directly on all citizens just cuz, what if they’re terrorists or something?

        The whole apparatus is disgusting, and I’m surprised to see people defending it in any sense at all.

      • @Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        05 months ago

        Thank goodness you’re here to tell us how the restraint that three-letter agencies are known for is alive and well!

  • @meleecrits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    145 months ago

    Unfortunately, it now falls on individuals to protect your online privacy. Get a VPN, make sure the websites you visit are encrypted, and even with all of that, I won’t put into text anything incriminating. My wife calls me paranoid (and she’s probably right), but there’s no such thing as being too secure these days.

    • @NightAuthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 months ago

      You never know who’s looking at your online activities and what kind of motivations they may have to find something incriminating. And it’s not just the now you have to worry about, but forever into the future because lots of private data is being warehoused for future analysis.

      Now imagine the worst case scenario of our government during your lifetime, do you want that government to have a ton of records about all your life online and offline?

  • Goku
    link
    fedilink
    15 months ago

    So what type of spying is this? If I use Linux am I still susceptible?

    • @SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      The government can tap foreign communications without a warrant, so if you’re speaking to someone they’ve tapped, they will potentially have access to that communication