Browsing the web I came across this (meta) search engine. From the first glance, it seems promising and giving quite a good results to my searches. Definitely better than Google, Bing or DDG, which tend to be full of SEO/ads/AI bullshit these days. Does anyone use it?

It somehow implies it’s open source and indeed there is github https://github.com/PresearchOfficial too, but I can’t find any link from the presearch.com itself to it. It’s just… IDK, weird?

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m immediately suspicious of anything that says “earn crypto rewards” so that’s a “no” from me.

    I just use Searx-NG as my meta search engine, and it’s been pretty good.

    There’s another self-hosted actual search engine (with its own dataset + crawler) but I forget its name off the top of my head. I’ve been looking into setting that up to experiment with.

    • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Same, anything peddling crypto and implying the user may earn it through no actual work being done, is suspicious.

      Searx-NG works well enough for me in 90% of cases, may not be perfect yet but if it keeps getting developed it will get better. I love those random redirectors that send you to a random instance, no centralised site you depend on then.

    • kurcatovium@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, that crypto part must be new(ish). I remember it definitely wasn’t there about half year ago when I first find out presearch. I believe it had no account to create either.

      Well, I’ll give SearXNG another chance I assume.

      • inconspicuouscolon@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Unrelated, but I’ve never seen someone use the word “assume” that way before. It technically works, I think?

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          As a native speaker, I read it as:

          I haven’t given it much thought, but there’s a good chance I’ll give it a shot.

          It’s a bit awkward, but I skipped over it and grasped what I assume was the intended meaning, so it’s fine. Better words would be “suppose” or “guess” in this context.