Nothing wrong with short articles. It’s better than sifting through paragraphs of “Electric cars are an innovative technology that take many of the featues of…” just to get to the relevant content.
Better than spreading one contiguous body of content across five tweets too, IMO.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240512030617/https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2024/03/28/ev-charging-stations-slow-rollout/
Is this whole article two paragraphs? Genuine question because that’s all that’s loading for me. Thanks for providing a non paywalled link
“The original article contains 109 words”
When your entire article can fit in a few tweets, maybe you shouldn’t publish it.
Nothing wrong with short articles. It’s better than sifting through paragraphs of “Electric cars are an innovative technology that take many of the featues of…” just to get to the relevant content.
Better than spreading one contiguous body of content across five tweets too, IMO.
I don’t see the problem with being concise.
I tried with archive.org, but I have a better solution. I will message you privately.