Instructions unclear, dropping bombs on Israel.
Instructions unclear, dropping bombs on Israel.
Remember: If you see someone with a gun, shoot on sight. It’s your constitutional right to use guns to defend yourself against people with guns.
CSPAN is basically Reality TV at this point…
Nope. It’s only double jeopardy if it happens in the same jurisdiction. A Federal trial would mean federal charges, which aren’t the same as state charges. Not the same charges, not double jeopardy.
Nobody goes hungry if the Human race is extinct.
Lots of stupid people asking “how would they know?”
That’s not the fucking point. The point is that if they catch you they can block future commits and review your past commits for poor quality code. They’re setting a quality standard, and establishing consequences for violating it.
If your AI generated code isn’t setting off red flags, you’re probably fine, but if something stupid slips through and the maintainers believe it to be the result of Generative AI, they will remove your code from the codebase and you from the project.
It’s like laws against weapons. If you have a concealed gun on your person and enter a public school, chances are that nobody will know and you’ll get away with it over and over again. But if anyone ever notices, you’re going to jail, you’re getting permanently trespassed from school grounds, and you’re probably not going to be allowed to own guns for a while.
And, it’s a message to everyone else quietly breaking the rules that they have something to lose if they don’t stop.
That may be the law, but the law is bullshit. Why should I be required to show the world my face when I go outside? Why aren’t I entitled to privacy?
more than likely theres a reason they don’t want to be identified and its rarely good.
Source in on this, or are you scared of people in hoodies too?
How was the Idiocracy universe not Fascist? Women are treated purely like objects, and the President can throw people into a death match against monster trucks on a whim. “Talking like a f*g” is a medical diagnosis in that world.
At least they had the wisdom to put the smart guy in charge, so it isn’t quite as kakistocratic as a Republican-led American tends to be.
Nobody is going to sue you for making fun of CrossFit. If they try, just show the court a video of people thrashing around with kettlebells and I think any judge would agree that CrissFitters are fucking stupid.
Pretty much every failed social network out there failed because it had poor moderation tools, and this genius thinks the biggest mistake Bluesky has made is having any moderation tools at all.
It’s also worth noting that the article attributes the Separation of Church and State to James Madison’s interpretation of the Bible, but never raises an issue with this fact as it did with more recent biblical analogies.
I think you make some good points. Ultimately I think that religious reasoning should be avoided in governing as much as possible, but given the fact that the Bible is nothing more than a book, there is no reason that it cannot be evoked by a judge so long as it is clear that it is being used to help explain the logic of the decision, not that the biblical text is leading the judge’s position.
Even as an Atheist I have found myself quoting Bible stories. They aren’t all dogmatic.