Capitalism say what?

*20Gbps to your home from their node.

However, you never upgraded your computer beyond a 1Gbps network connection, the cross connect down the line is limited to less than 10Gbps, the server you want to access throttles you to 100Mbps max, you have 100+ ms ping times.

Unless you have 20+ devices in your house all trying to pull 1Gbps simultaneously, it’s a bit of a marketing stunt. There may be some edge cases, but even 4K streaming is only 25-50Mbps, so you could run 5 devices and be fine.

What I’d love to see is guaranteed latency and QoS settings that ensure I’ll never be throttled during any period rather than more bandwidth.

I thought a car had to have that before it went on sale?

There’s also Nutanix.

Now if only they had the same support that unions do in Sweden

So Musk, how’s that working out with Sweden?

And I care about you….why?

$75m in 5 weeks. That’s a run rate of $780m per year. That is not a small chunk of revenue.

Reading the article it doesn’t sound like it’s Microsoft’s issue but the vendor’s implementation and lack of using the secure communication protocol.

Okay. I’ll answer seriously to this. Blockchain can’t store an entire contract (not within reason). Likewise, contracts will never be made public. So at most you’ll get is a pointer to where the contract is held. The contents of the contract can be changed (though you could put a checksum in the chain too), but that still doesn’t address things. Also if you are concerned about “well no one else has a contract” then all that needs to happen is everyone gets a contract, then the chain is inundated with contracts and all you’d have is a pointer and a checksum and you have no idea what’s in the actual contract.

Didn’t the Colorado suit though only focus on the primary, and the GOP is a “private” entity who can select who they want. Now if they happen to chose Trump and put him on the general ballot then that is where a lawsuit should occur. But as it stands now, since he hasn’t been selected for a general ballot there was no standing in the case.

They’re only 2% short of being able to do that. I think Microsoft has a 49% stake.

RUD, aka “Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly”. I love how you can make “shit blew up in a way we didn’t expect” sound so mundane.

Interesting. The article literally says “primary ballot”

Primaries aren’t the place to be fighting this. Sadly the Democratic Party and GOP are private entities. They could easily say “fuck your, this is who we choose” and that’s that. Where the fights need to be taking place are on the general ballots as he doesn’t belong there. But these primary arguments are pointless and just embolden him with each ruling in his favor.

Sadly this is no longer a problem that can be fixed in the House. As long as republicans are scared of getting primaried by MAGA voters they’ll constantly tiptoe around what those 10% keep spewing. If they knew their seats were safe, you would have seen more of a bipartisan “fuck you” to the hardliners.

Hopefully there would have been some change after this months elections, but really one of the few ways I see left is if the democrats try to work with enough republicans who don’t have to worry about maga primaries to form a majority coalition.