Ugh. I hate it when geriatric populist fascists accidentally stumble into a halfway decent joke.

“I notice it keeps tilting to the left,” Trump joked, “Like too many other things!”

I guess he is an “entertainer,” so it shouldn’t be much of a surprise that his jokes are better than his platform. Double entendre definitely intended.

Of course, to everyone watching—at least, to everyone watching who isn’t behind Trump—it’s pretty clear that everything is actually tilting to the right, and becoming a whole lot more unstable.

Until the city decides to get rid of the subsidized bus system because “Uber is a better service and covers the routes anyway” and then they jack the price sky-high.

Did his son get an email about it?

Johnson is “we’re electing a president not a pastor” incarnate, with all the short-sightedness and tomfoolery that comes with it.

“If there’s no massive cheating” is such a meaningless phrase that they could use it to mean anything afterward. “Oh no, I heard someone say that their cousin was a cashier at a store where their coworker overheard a customer talking on the phone about a letter that their post office received from Russia on election day, so obviously there’s massive cheating and Trump should just be in office.”

That said, I don’t know that this rises to the level of “outrageous” in modern political discourse, sadly. A “foolish” position, definitely. “Corrupt,” perhaps. “Morally bankrupt.” “Anti-democratic.” But the position is much more reasonable than most Republicans are willing to grant these days, and that’s what’s truly outrageous.

It’s valid English and grammar, but it’s a potentially reasonable position that anything which requires a specific domain knowledge to interpret may be valid but isn’t perfect. You kind of have to know how journalists shorten sentences to make headlines in order to read it correctly; most native English-speaking adults do have that domain knowledge, but clearly not everyone since OP didn’t have it.

That said, I don’t know why this specific headline tripped OP up. It doesn’t seem particularly ambiguous or difficult to me.

“(A) Tennessee woman (who was) denied (an) abortion after (finding out her) fetus’ ‘brain (was) not attached’ slams (Tennessee’s abortion) ban”

Hope that helps.