data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12b45/12b4504b12f2b6241a594e659c63fc754f9e990e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/021ad/021ad62c149e2c2330c0f3909d66441b98ba4d8c" alt=""
0·
4 months agoYou didn’t read the article did you? Its not about the inclusion of a character, but about how a specific scene with that character is handled. The author claims it is completely jarring, doesn’t fit into the games setting and doesn’t even use the games existing lore for transgender people but instead uses modern terminology.
I found the article to very informative and not at all “gamergatey”.
Its points are:
- this is the scene
- it is bad
- here is exelent trans representation in a fantasy setting
- “its a BioWare self insert”
- this is how they could have handled it better
- the game is great, but now everybody will just talk about woke, so again the game is good
Exactly. Planting trees is the only thing that is positive in this equation.
Burning wood = more CO2
Cuting down trees = less carbon capture = more CO2 in the future
The only reduction happens at the place trees are planted and if that is in another country then you are not reducing your country’s carbon footprint. And if the exporting country isnt planting trees than you might as well burn oil in regards to CO2 emissions.