The same way Israel is solving hunger with AI in Gaza.
Stalin once said, “Net cheloveka, net problemy” (“No person, no problem”).
The same way Israel is solving hunger with AI in Gaza.
Stalin once said, “Net cheloveka, net problemy” (“No person, no problem”).
Hahaha, so instead of reducing their emissions, they are actually increasing them year after year. What a hypocrisy!
What makes you think that they are not scraping Lemmy too? The only reason they might not be is probably how niche Lemmy and the fediverse are, but I am sure there have been people already doing it.
Do not forget their so-called open document format (OOXML), which is everything but open, and their deliberate efforts to suffocate the competition, by abusing their market position.
That’s a very strange title, I think in the end the US would suffer more, because China would be able to easily replace this talent, but the same cannot be said for the US.
This AI craze propped a lot of companies to new historical highs. It is of course logical that most companies would like to jump on that bandwagon.
Right now we are on the honeymoon period of AI and I can only guess we are fast approaching the limits of what the AI can do.
The DP1.4a supports maximum 4K at 120fps, everything above that is using DSC (display stream compression).and if I am not wrong adds a bit of latency and a bit of processing overhead, because your GPU has to compress the frames. Additionally the compression adds some loss to the equation, but according to reports it is very hard to distinguish it from the lossless picture.
It is not a big deal but it is nice to have support for DpP2.1. DP2.1 has more than double the bandwidth of DP1.4a, meaning that it supports 4K 240fps, introduces FEC (forward error correction) and improves the HDR quality.
The bottom line is that if I shed north of 1K I would like to get something which is future proof.
I am waiting for a 4K monitor at least 120fps, that has proper DP 2.1 support. It is ridiculous that even today most of those monitors are coming with DP 1.4.
New OLED screens are very resilient to burn-ins. You can check for yourself. And mind you, the majority of users won’t have any problems with burn ins because of the way they are using those monitors, this test is far from how the majority of users will use their monitors. https://libreddit.oxymagnesium.com/r/hardware/comments/180cc44/rtings_10_month_update_permanent_burnin_oleds/
Then explain why this is a global phenomenon?
Didn’t they already implant their device in their first human patient?
Apple is gonna apple