• 0 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle
rss





  • No. The LA-SF connection was THE connection to make for a number of good reasons:

    -HSR is a direct replacement for short-haul airlines. The LAX-SFO corridor is one of if not THE busiest air corridors on earth, and CAHSR is going to put a tremendous dent in it.

    -There’s not really any easy way to get from California’s interior (the central valley cities like Bakersfield, Merced, Fresno, etc that everyone likes to dunk on for not being LA or San Francisco) to LA or San Francisco. Basically, your only options are a shitty drive or a shitty bus, though the Amtrak San Joaquins and ACE extension line can at least get you to the bay area if you can access them. CAHSR makes it much easier for people in California’s interior to visit the metro area’s without becoming traffic, and makes it easier for folks in the metro area’s to visit the central valley in case they uh… Um… Want to see a cow? Oh, go to Yosemite or Sequoia national parks, yeah, that.

    -Brightline West is NOT real High Speed Rail. Brightline is sort of at the high end of Mid-Speed Rail, which is still not bad, we could really do with a lot more of it for longer haul passenger service and intercity service where HSR doesn’t make sense. But they operate below the official HSR speeds in order to dodge a lot of really expensive FRA regulations. CAHSR can’t do that because it has to be a true replacement for the air route, which means that cost overruns are going to happen.

    -The first true HSR project in the US was always going to be insanely expensive. California took the hit on this, but hopefully the knowledge, experience, and supply chains the CAHSRA creates will get picked up by other HSR projects in the states who can leverage it to build their projects cheaper.


  • Notably, the legislation calls for the U.S. government to reassert control over “recovered technologies of unknown origin” currently held by defense contractors. Some analysts suspect that corporations potentially holding such exotic technology are exerting undue pressure and influence to oppose the provision in Schumer’s legislation.

    Found why. It’s absolutely amazing how consistently bad and stupid the financialization of everything has been. The apparent government conspiracy to hide UFOs and aliens isn’t down to a nefarious plot to control the world or keep the peace, it’s to protect the investors. Jesus wept.








  • I’d like to know why exactly the board fired Altman before I pass judgment one way or the other, especially given the mad rush by the investor class to re-instate him. It makes me especially curious that the employees are sticking up for him. My initial intuition was that MSFT convinced Altman to cross bridges that he shouldn’t have (for $$$$), but I doubt that a little more now that the employees are sticking up for him. Something fucking weird is going on, and I’m dying to know what it is.


  • Look, if your point is that “they deserve to use shitty messaging if they want, don’t worry about it, bro”, well, okay. That’s your opinion, and that’s fine. I don’t think it’s a smart choice, politically speaking, and that’s where I’m coming from. People are feeling the hurt right now, and I think you’re going to find that correcting their complaints with “we should be thanking Biden, actually” is bitter medicine. Maybe they know what they’re doing, but somehow this feels familiar from the '16 Clinton Campaign; like they’ve got permission to fucking phone it in because the other guy is unelectable. I hope you’re right and they really do know what they’re doing.




  • I’m really sick of this line of reasoning that functionally goes:

    1. Look, you don’t know what you’re talking about, it’s fine, everything’s fine, and despite what your lived experience is telling you, you’re doing great because just look at the charts and the stonks. Yes, okay, you had to cut back on groceries, but did you see the charts? The economy is doing great.

    And when somebody says “hey, this doesn’t align with my experience, can we just acknowledge that things aren’t actually that great and work towards fixing them?” The response is

    1. Ugh, why would you want to vote for Trump?!

    MF, I don’t, but if the people don’t feel seen by Biden, they might not vote for him specifically because of all the tone-deaf paternalistic “stop whining about my economy, you’re fine actually” messaging. It’s kind of a similar vibe to answering “can we not support genocide in Gaza, please?” With “why do you hate Jews?!”. It’s just an attempt to avoid dealing with legitimate criticism while deflecting it back onto the asker. The clinton campaign already tested this strategy in 16, and we all saw how that turned out.