Are they paying this freak for this one on one?
Are they paying this freak for this one on one?
Thats a fun thought experiment at least. Is there any way for an AI to gain physical control on its own, within the bounds of software. It can make programs and interact with the web.
Some combination of bank hacking, 3D modeling, and ordering 3D prints delivered gets it close, but i dont know if it can seal the deal without human assistance. Some kind of assembly seems necessary, or at least powering on if it just orders a prebuilt robotic appendage.
Just protecting political stances that cant stand to any amount of scrutiny. Conservatives become more and more insular, needing thicker earplugs and louder megaphones.
Wild how russian collussion happens when you dont pursue russian collussion charges.
sadly this just isnt putting money where their mouth is. Pales in comparison to road investments, heck even freight rail investments from the infrastructure bill. It’s a fraction of the funding for just California’s one high speed rail line. This is gonna do even less than keep passenger rail from falling further behind freight rail and car transit. Get ready for more cars, more traffic, more emissions, less possibility of getting somewhere without a car.
Thats an awful lot of bribery
Its a good thing. But kind of weirdly specific to only appy to hedge funds. The problem is homes being hoarded as investment vehicles instead of places to live, thats gonna apply to any kind of investment firm.
still zero consequences
Its a bit of a cart before the horse thing. As fundamental as policy positions on things like economics, healthcare, education etc are, how the government is run and elected has to come first if you want any of that to happen. Like you can promote the most die hard environmentalist candidate, but because our system has lobbying and corporate financed elections, that poisons your efforts from the outset. You have to get rid of the lobbying first. I think our FPTP 2 party system is something that poisons any efforts on any political issue. Like i said id love to support someone with better political stances and voting reform, but i have to support voting reform first. And anyone that wants to outlaw lobbying too.
No its a vote for green party, and for ranked choice voting
Those fools! If only we had 1.3 guns per person to defend ourselves!
probly Jill Stein. Unless someone better that also supports ranked choice or proportional representation shows up.
It sounds like this rambling doesnt involve me.
im voting for someone that supports ranked choice.
Who said anything about not voting?
When does this brinkmanship dilemma stop occurring? How long are dems gonna get a blank check to spit in our faces because republicans are a looming threat? Is MAGA gonna be gone in 2028? 2032? When is the income gap gonna stop accelerating? Or emissions? When are houses gonna be affordable, or education? What about the situation is supposed to improve if dems win 2028?
Super Intendent Chalmers:“Can I see?”
I dont think server rooms are often going to need humidifying, electronics like pretty low humidity. and water usage for cooling isnt generally consumed, the same water is used over and over again.
I dunno what kinda folks you think are in congress. They’re all rich. Its not a matter of being able to afford living as an elected official, they have to afford winning an election.
Case in point, this very article.
But they are paid well. This happened anyway
it’s a pet peeve when religious folk make claims that are in fact testable hypotheses. Like we could measure various metrics of “god’s wrath” in relation to regions of voting preference. Poverty, famine, disease, mortality, natural disasters.