GigglyBobble

People don’t think about that. You have to register somewhere in order to use your $12.99 cam, install some app and are good to go.

How would a someone not interested in tech know that the footage data is stored on some online server and you are at the mercy of their itsec.

Designing the model to prevent it from generating illegal content

Yeah, good luck designing that.

Linux if you’re prepared to support it entirely yourself

What does this even mean? The most work caused in administering my company’s IT comes from destructive patches from Microsoft. Just like a month ago they released a security patch that caused the domain controller to not reboot which is pretty much the worst thing you can run into aside outright malicious actors (not sure Microsoft doesn’t count as one). So I had to “support” users by rolling back untested shit until a hotfix was released.

My private setup runs exclusively on Linux. Patches also sometimes cause trouble but it’s just as infrequent and less destructive if it happens.

It’s really not that different from an admin point of view but it’s not Linux’ business model to snoop on or extort you or to force proprietary hardware on you because sEcUrItY.

Well, obviously. It’s just a protocol. Why wouldn’t they be able to make it cross-platform if they wanted to?

That study says nothing about maintenance but is about repair cost after accidents. Those are 1/3 higher for EV because also small damages to batteries can increase risk of fire and batteries are also more readily exchanged due to lack of experience of the shops.

Everyone is talking about breaks while the study doesn’t say anything about that.

fair pay for fair work

Sure but what’s fair? As you described, the work did change considerably. Translating from scratch is much more work and also much harder than fixing a mostly ok output. It would not be fair to pay both jobs the same amount since the latter can be done by people with less expertise/education.

Eventually, AI output won’t need any human editing at all. What then? Resisting change driven by technology is understandable from the individual perspective but it has always been doomed to fail. You know that “computer” used to be a job title?

Isn’t blind partisanship the American way nowadays?

A great example how helpful hatred is then.

deleted by creator

Maybe they came far enough that the party now takes over their equipment.

And if the operator was commanded to do it? And to delete the logs? How naive are you that this is somehow makes war more humane?

Unless the operator decides hitting exactly those targets fits their strategy and they can blame a software bug.

Seems pretty obvious, right? Someone on Lemmy once argued, he did it to avoid taxes. Failed to explain how this is profitable in the end though.

I really wish we could call it tokens (or scam) and make “crypto” stand for cryptography again…

As far as I remember they acted in parallel and pushed the implementation already. They claimed it to be rogue actions of over-enthusiastic devs after the concept paper caused a public outcry.

I haven’t followed that issue but Google will continue to try to close us in, for sure.

Implicitly they often do already because web devs have become more and more lazy and don’t test any browser but the one they prefer themselves.

And where do you see any resemblance to a blockchain?

From the article it is just cryptographic signing - once by the camera with its built-in key and once on changes by the CAI tool which has its own key.

it was never once an issue

Every Apple thread has at least one of those replies.

at least PC gamers are largely outspoken about DRM and there are pretty popular platforms that cater to them

I fear the day that’s no longer the case. Feels like gaming is becoming more “proprietary platform first” with every year.

Yeah, you have to be wary of whatever online service you use. I don’t really trust DDG but I trust the alternatives less.