FaceDeer

The only way I can imagine this working is by twisting the definition of the words “search engine” enough that you can claim that there aren’t search engines, but really there are still, just under a different name.

Search engines aren’t actually the “problem” that OP is wanting to address, here, though. He just doesn’t like the specific search engines that actually exist right now. What he should really be asking is how a search engine could be implemented that doesn’t have the particular flaws that he’s bothered by.

Nor is it up to you. But fact remains, it’s not illegal until there are actually laws against it. The court cases that might determine whether current laws are against it are still ongoing.

Also pretty sure training LLMs after someone opts out is illegal?

Why? There have been a couple of lawsuits launched in various jurisdictions claiming LLM training is copyright violation but IMO they’re pretty weak and none of them have reached a conclusion. The “opting” status of the writer doesn’t seem relevant if copyright doesn’t apply in the first place.

By “old archives” I mean everything from 2022 and earlier.

There are torrents of complete Reddit comment archives available for any random person who wants them, I’m sure Reddit themselves has a comprehensive edit history of everything.

“Model collapse” can be easily avoided by keeping old human data with new synthetic data in the training set. The old archives of Reddit content from before there was AI are still around.

You think they don’t have the originals archived?

Honestly, I’ve been using Bing a lot in recent months thanks to its integrated AI. Google is now just for when I know I want a specific web page, when it’s a general answer I want then nothing beats Bing Chat. So this is a good move by Google.

Some are, but they still don’t build rockets. I think there’s some other factor that’s important.

And even if SLS is an example of non-private rocketry, it’s hardly something that should be touted as a positive example. Especially not when launch pace is your criterion.

Yeah, why aren’t regular folks building reusable heavy-lift rocket systems?

This sort of thing is so self-sabotaging. The website already has your comment, and a license to use it. By deleting your stuff from the web you only ensure that the AI is definitely going to be the better resource to go to for answers.

Maybe for people who have no clue how to work with an LLM. They don’t have to be perfect to still be incredibly valuable, I make use of them all the time and hallucinations aren’t a problem if you use the right tools for the job in the right way.

OP asked “how can I accomplish goal X?”

You responded “Goal X sucks, you should accomplish goal Y instead!”

That’s not exactly useful.