…and there’s the nuance I was looking for.
Good on ya.
…and there’s the nuance I was looking for.
Good on ya.
Fairly dismal on the face of it, but I can’t help but imagine there is more legal nuance at play here than the article conveys, and if so, maybe someone could explain it to me?
Yeah, gonna disagree. Can’t imagine too many Democrats feeling real generous towards this self-aggrandizing obstructionist-in-chief.
As stated elsewhere in the conversation, this guy can’t even carry West Virginia and he’s supposed to make a dent in the incumbent vote count? Unlikely.
I like to think that these asshats generally get exactly what they deserve, and that they will take care of themselves for us. In old Joe’s case, since shame is out of the question, the best we can hope for is irrelevance. He’s got a great head-start already, and an utterly failed bid for the Office of the President may just be the coup de grace 🤌🏼
Yep, but who’s air and time and money will he be wasting? I feel that if he pulls two votes away from you know who then we’re all set, so go get ‘em, tiger!
Faces very filling apparently
You wouldn’t know her, she lives in Canada
“Lie down with racist leopards, get your face eaten.” -Michael Scott, probably
Extra credit for feckless