This is funny because you’re the one confusing LLM as the only option when it comes to AI.

A lot of things actually. A ton of material science breakthroughs lately. Science in general. I’ve read about recent astronomical discoveries, too.

This is the dipshit that bright back asbestos (guys which country of the top producer?).

It’s probably that people familiar with the technicals of AI don’t automatically assume it’s LLMs being talked about. There’s several other types being out to very good use, especially in the sciences right now.

Even LLMs have their place as interpretors for those other types. Having natural language interpretation that is fairly accurate the vast majority of the time is a powerful tool with a lot of applications. Near Real time translation or closed captioning is great for accessibility.

Half the country is a climate danger zone at this point.

Which is why people use the GUI for pretty much everything. Linux demands you use archaic commands to do anything useful.

There’s nothing really to lose.

Just hours of your time as some random miniscule feature you were reliant upon without realizing it until it was missing, then have to look up a dozen different fixes using some stone aged console commands, none of which actually fix your issue…

Why did this take you a second?

I’m pretty sure people have, in this age of “let’s play” videos. You can see the gameplay play out in real time instead of listening to a brief, curated summary.

If you’re a w2 worker, you can’t even start to do your taxes until like end of January at the earliest…employers don’t have the forms ready.

And banks wait until March most of the time.

It’s being phrased as an ROI per employee “asset”, not as compensation per actual employee.

Gabe is pocketing most of this.

Well that sounds easier. Odds that Gryffindor’s sword could destroy the ring?

The fact that you’d rather remain poor and dependent upon working rather than look up a couple of simple terms is baffling.

Don’t need to be educated to stick to an ETF tracking a broad market index fund like S&P500. Averaging 7-10% inflation adjusted per year for over a century now…

This is the dumb kind of “best do nothing, because both no is perfect” approach to making sure no disincentives are ever taken because someone somewhere else might also try to do the illegal thing that they’ll lose access to the moment they’re caught…

I never suggested destroying the technology that is “AI”. I’m not uncomfortable about AI, I’ve even considered pivoting my career in that direction.

I suggested destroying the particular implementation that was trained on the illegitimate data. If someone can recreate it using legitimate data, GREAT. That’s what we want to happen. The tool isn’t the problem. It’s the method they’re using to train them.

Please don’t make up random ass narratives I never even hunted at, and then argue against them.

That’s stupid. The damage is still done to the owner of that data used illegally. Make them destroy it.

But when you levy such miniscule fines that are less than they stand to make from it, it’s just a cost of business. Fines can work if they were appropriate to the value derived.

Yes, you’re all doing it wrong…by doing it at all.

They could get the fuck out of politics.

What dumbass is letting AI post articles without human oversight? That’s like rule one of what not to do.