‘Eyes Everywhere’: Congress Is About to Vote to Expand Mass Surveillance of Americans, Experts Warn::Privacy experts worry that a proposed reform bill would greatly widen how the government can surveil Americans’ digital communications.

    • @NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      445 months ago

      Its about pushing boundaries.

      If a camera on every street corner is legal, just imagine what they are doing with that data.

      Same thing with actionable data. If the goal is to just abduct you in a black helicopter and waterboard you, the law doesn’t matter. If the goal is to ruin your reputation and put you and other “enemies of the state” in prison, then you need a legal basis. Otherwise it becomes a huge kerfuffle and you become a martyr.

      • UltraMagnus0001
        link
        fedilink
        English
        125 months ago

        With AI and knowledge of everyone, the rich will be able to control us. Some might say they’re not controllable, but you are the minority. Mass surveillance and control is what we’re heading for. 1984 I might sound like a tinfoil nutjob but it’s slowly happening and most don’t even notice.

        • @NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          65 months ago

          Why bother? We are already on our way to a more Brave New World style dystopia where we actively surrender because of the opioids and orgasm boxes.

  • @littlebluespark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    355 months ago

    Apparently, as a nation, we’re supposed to be surprised that they’re trying to pass laws that “let” them do what they’ve already been doing for decades…

  • @TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    155 months ago

    For anyone that still doesn’t know, this is already a thing for all US made (owned) hardware. Has been for 15 years+. This is expanding it to everything that would be sold on the market. You know phones are hotspots too… That’s right.

    You know why the US is so against Huawei? Because they CANT spy on every packet like they can with a Cisco, Juniper, Ruckus, etc switch. And when those start to be installed in scale, it’s a problem for the intelligence collection. This is just a small change to make what’s already there more palatable in stages. So that in another decade when things become declassified fully and more publisized, Americans don’t believe it is an issue.

      • @jmp242@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        85 months ago

        Indeed, it’s useful to China for blackmail, but they’d have a much harder time rolling me up in the US than the US government. And it’s likely hardly worth the effort to the extent they might try.

      • @TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55 months ago

        Absolutely. I 100% prefer the Chinese to have all my data. I am a nothing person with no political power so if China wants to surveil me and train datasets with my data, cool. Because the alternative is the US and five eyes having that data and I absolutely do not want that.

        Unfortunately it makes you look like the crazy uncle in the tinfoil hat if you try to bring it up. It’s so outlandishly crazy like a Hollywood movie people don’t believe it’s real.

  • Alex
    link
    fedilink
    English
    55 months ago

    Literally 1984. Since when are the US of A a part of Oceania?

  • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    From the actual bill: https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1323

    The bill enhances accountability for FBI and other government officials who fail to comply with the laws and rules governing FISA. For example, the bill:

    • Holds FBI executive leaders accountable for FISA non-compliance, including by withholding promotions or compensation.
    • Ensures accountability for FBI employees who conduct noncompliant U.S. person queries, including zero tolerance for willful misconduct and escalating consequences for unintentional non-compliance.
    • Creates new specific criminal liability and administrative penalties and increases existing penalties for government officials who engage in a range of intentional misconduct related to FISA, such as leaking FISA-derived information or making a false declaration before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
  • @iigr45@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15 months ago

    i always hate these headlines, who the hell are those “experts”, same applies to the word “scientists”