I mean, if Tesla thinks the guy is the owner, then he should be able to know where it is and control it. If he was no longer the owner, they should have updated that with Tesla.
Yeah sounds like a simple case
Yeah, but look at the source.
Same article could say women tried to block co-owner from vehicle.
Over two years of she was in such fear of husband why didn’t she buy out/sell the car she has co-owned title on.
Maybe she didn’t have the funds to buy out an expensive car.
You’re literally blaming the victim here.
Usually in cases like this the court looks to who makes the payments. He may be co owner but if he hasn’t made any payments since separating and hasn’t used the vehicle it isn’t his.
deleted by creator
Wait a minute. The cars can barely drive, and now you want them to enforce the law???
That is the most insane shit I’ve ever heard.
Sounds like the restraining order should have listed out additional remedies, or maybe even made her the sole owner.
The honor system nature of restraining orders allowed the abusive husband to break the restraining order. They just make it extra illegal when the restrained person goes ahead and commits whatever crime they were going to commit anyway.
