When Bloomberg reported that Spotify would be upping the cost of its premium subscription from $9.99 to $10.99, and including 15 hours of audiobooks per month in the U.S., the change sounded like a win for songwriters and publishers. Higher subscription prices typically equate to a bump in U.S. mechanical royalties — but not this time.

By adding audiobooks into Spotify’s premium tier, the streaming service now claims it qualifies to pay a discounted “bundle” rate to songwriters for premium streams, given Spotify now has to pay licensing for both books and music from the same price tag — which will only be a dollar higher than when music was the only premium offering. Additionally, Spotify will reclassify its duo and family subscription plans as bundles as well.

  • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    No matter what you think about Apple, Apple Music pays multiple times more than Spotify

    And Tidal pays multiples more than Apple.

    It’s up to you if you want to support artists or not.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I switched to Tidal after Spotify announced the price increase. The catalogue is basically identical, the apps are much more intuitive, and the audio quality is higher (they recently rolled their premium FLAC subscription into the basic one).

      I had to retrain the algorithm for a bit, but that was not so difficult. There are services that can migrate/convert playlists which might actually work for favourites as well.

      Also, it’s easy easier to download stuff from Tidal, which is very nice for listening to Audiobooks with a dedicated player.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Does YouTube music pay its artists? I prefer an Android platform. A lot of the stuff I want isn’t on Apple Music for classical is also why.