• Corroded@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I feel like it’s going to be a challenge to find a definition of malicious most people agree on.

    Someone might think it’s fine to make nudes of Captain Marvel for example because she’s a character. They don’t really care about the Brie Larson aspect.

    I suppose there is the option to eliminate any kind of name based suggestions.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I personally don’t see that much of an issue of people making “nudes” of others since they’re fake anyway. I see an issue when they’re used for things like bullying, blackmail, etc. That is technically already illegal, just not well enforced for any sort of digital topic and hasn’t been for over a couple of decades now. Hence why I find the attention the LLM stuff gets exceptionally hypocritical and overblown, because non of them really cared when someone simply got cyberbullied, or blackmailed through classically edited images - let alone screamed for the outlawing of editing software or social media.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        How about we instead eliminate the people who think it’s wrong or otherwise demeaning to have publicly available of yourself nude. I can’t imagine these people have any redeeming qualities anyway. And by eliminate, I mean hunt them with a crossbow.